Prince of ThornsApril 2, 2014
Well, maybe it is not so bad, but somehow I am in the mood for ravaging this novel.
Since the era of A Game of Thrones, after the era of The Lord of the Rings, the world of fantasy indeed has changed. The fantasy world became darker and more violent. We have several good ones: The Black Company (this one predates Game of Thrones), The Blade Itself, Gardens of the Moon, and The Lies of Locke Lamora. The defining line between the good guy and the bad guy is not so clear. Especially after the Game of Thrones HBO series became so popular, it looks like many fantasy writers will try to copy this kind of theme. Including this one.
Since the beginning of the novel, we are served with endless (and mindless violence). I don’t mind violence; the books listed above are among my favorite. But mindless violence does not serve me well. It is violence for the sake of violence, not for the sake of the plot or character building. There are almost no loveable character in this novel (except the Nuban).
The alternating between the current and the event four years earlier also does not serve the plot well. It is disrupting the flow of the story. I don’t mind a flash back, but the flash back used in this one does not amplify the story at all.
But I think the worst part is the world building. This is supposed to be the high point of this novel, because it looks like that the author worked so hard to make the world in this novel resembles our real world, after a nuclear holocaust, using his term the Day of a Thousand Sun, thousands of years after that. And yet, it failed. The writer should learned from A Canticle for Leibowitz. The world after the nuclear war in this novel is believable. It does not directly fall into a medieval world, but more like a Mad Max world. The writer should also learn from The Shadow of the Torturer. The allusions made in Gene Wolfe novel is witty, which require the best of mind to digest. In Prince of Thorns, the allusion is too direct. And the repeating reference to the classics such as Plato is not believable. Believe me, if our civilization fails, Plato (and all other classics) will be the first to disappear. It is proven already in our dark age in Europe, Plato and all of the Greek classics are saved only because it survived in the Arab world, in Arabic translation. Or some in the hand of the secluded monks, which actually resembles the plot in A Canticle for Leibowitz. In Prince of Thorn, it is just unbelievable. If they still read Plato, the civilization is still intact. It is much better if the writer simply made the world out of nowhere, without linking it to our future world.
I almost stopped reading this novel, if not for you, my reviewer readers (ha!) I might give this book a bit the benefit of doubt, and try (very hard) to finish this book, because I will only review the book that I finished reading.
Surely the author can write, but he simply wasted his talent in this novel. And for me this is the end of this series. There is no way I want to repeat the experience of reading this novel.
ONE STAR it is.